I write fanfic – fiction based on characters from a television show, movie, book, whatever. It’s a curious combination of original writing and “borrowing” – much as story-tellers have done for eons, but now prolific thanks to the world of the Internet. And there are so many different reasons for writing – but most seem to feel that it allows them to not only keep alive a favorite, but take their heroes/heroines to greater depths, either character-wise or adventure-wise.
My own began because I renewed an interest in an old show, and, having been away from writing for many years, I saw an opportunity to “ease back” into it, slowly building up my confidence. And it was extremely enjoyable. It was also a lot of work.
Many people disdainfully dismiss fanfic writers as “mere hobbyists”. I wish they knew how much work many fanfic writers go through, trying not to just “have fun”, but trying to delve into the characters and really improve and refine their craft – for writing, of any kind, is a craft. And as with any craft, there are those who do only what is necessary, and those who take it very seriously, and spend hours trying to get that chapter, or even that paragraph, “right”. Maybe the characters are borrowed – but they are also enhanced, and grown, and the stories themselves are taking the originals into new directions and new situations. Not to mention that new truly original characters are introduced, which is particularly difficult to “get right” when one has to make them as real to the reader as the established (and beloved) characters.
As much as “outsiders” may put down and criticize fanfic, there is, unfortunately, almost as much contentiousness within the realm. The conflict between those who write “just for fun” and really aren’t worried about the writing as much as putting their heroes into a different situation. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, except it gives fanfic’s critics more ammunition. There’s also the world of “slash” – putting characters into romantic relationships which, many times, means same sex relationships which were not even hinted at in the original. This puts fanfic writers, in general, in another quagmire, not only with the “outsiders” (GASP! How *dare* they?!?!) but within the ranks – “slashers” do have a tendency to be overly-sensitive about their writing, mistaking honest critiquing of their writing for a put-down of their genre. And, equally bedeviling, some non-slashers tend to color their view of slash with their distress at the genre, rather than the craft. No matter how well-written, they will find something wrong with it.
But in other ways, fanfic writing is no different than “mainstream” writing. Finding someone to give honest critiques in fanfic, compared to finding a good editor in MS. While it’s gratifying to have someone say they love your writing, that’s what you want to hear *after* the draft has been finalized. Which brings me to the point of this posting.
I have been very lucky, in my “fandom”, to have found a critiquing group that knows the difference between a “critique” and a “bashing”, and between honesty and stroking. At least, I thought I had. Now, I’m not so sure. I had a member critique a draft, and was quite “strident” in her objections, not so much to the story, but to the way I had constructed it. While I found her choice of phrasing irritating, she made some good points – and some that simply aren’t relevant to the way I write (I might add that I am not exactly a novice at this). Rather than accept my decisions (which is a focal point of the group – that the writer has the right to accept or reject suggestions), this person decided to withhold further comments – at least, in an open and obvious way. Instead my story was used as an example of a “problem” when another story by another author was critiqued, something that has never been done in that group before. Comments I made in group discussions were misconstrued, and several people in the group apparently did not read my corrections. I felt I had a major-league target on my back. So I dropped out. Temporarily. Hopefully.
The reason I even bring this up here is because my concerns were not adequately addressed in the group – indeed, they were not addressed at all, at least in the “public forum” in which the problems occurred. And I would truly hate to see this sort of thing happen to another writer, where a member decides they like a story idea, but want *their* story written, not the one the author wants to write. I think that’s what occurred here. At least, that’s the only reason I can come up with. My only other choice would be that this person is such a control-freak, they can’t stand it when someone disagrees with them. Neither is very flattering, but at least the former is understandable.
So, in the meantime, I continue to work on the story, although much of the enjoyment has gone, and the excitement of experimenting is in great need of CPR. I have two writers who have agreed to “beta” my work as I progress – one who’s relatively new, but has a wonderfully fresh eye as a result, and another “old hand” whose grasp of the characters is tremendous. Both have always shown an ability to be honest without being crabby, an asset to be sure.
I guess my final take on all of this is that it’s one thing to criticize, but another to critique. If you haven’t read fanfic, try it. If you haven’t found stories worthy of your time – try again. It’s out there, and getting better all the time. And if you don’t like a story, try to be honest with the author as to why, without getting vitriolic. None of us is perfect